| Preface |
|
7 | (8) |
| Introduction |
|
15 | (1) |
| A. HISTORY OF THE TEACHING OF KARMA |
|
15 | (20) |
|
|
|
15 | (2) |
|
|
|
16 | (1) |
|
The mechanism of retribution |
|
|
16 | (1) |
|
The nature of the retributed entity |
|
|
17 | (1) |
|
The Sarvastivadin-Vaibhasika School |
|
|
17 | (5) |
|
|
|
18 | (2) |
|
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
The mechanism of retribution |
|
|
20 | (1) |
|
|
|
21 | (1) |
|
The Vatsiputriya-Sammitiya School |
|
|
22 | (3) |
|
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
The mechanism of retribution |
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
|
|
25 | (7) |
|
|
|
26 | (1) |
|
The mechanism of retribution |
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
|
|
28 | (4) |
|
Root-opinion of the Darstantikas |
|
|
29 | (1) |
|
Branch-opinion and variant branch-opinion of the Sautrantikas |
|
|
29 | (2) |
|
The subtle consciousness (suksmacitta) of the Sutrapramanikas |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
The Vijnavadin-Yogacara School |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
|
|
33 | (2) |
| B. THE KARMASIDDHIPRAKARANA |
|
35 | (6) |
|
|
|
35 | (1) |
|
Character of the work: External testimony |
|
|
35 | (1) |
|
Character of the work: Internal testimony |
|
|
36 | (5) |
| First Part: ERRONEOUS THEORIES WITH RESPECT TO THE NATURE OF ACTION |
|
| A. THE VIJNAPTI |
|
41 | (9) |
|
The Theory of the Sarvastivadin-Vaibhasikas (vijnapti-as-shape): |
|
|
41 | (3) |
|
Presentation (Para. 1--2) |
|
|
41 | (1) |
|
|
|
42 | (1) |
|
|
|
43 | (1) |
|
Answer to an Objection (Para. 5) |
|
|
43 | (1) |
|
The Theory of the Vatsiputriya and Sammityas (vijnapti-as-movement): |
|
|
44 | (4) |
|
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
First Argument; Refutation (Para. 7) |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
Second Argument; Refutation (Para. 8) |
|
|
45 | (2) |
|
Third Argument; Refutation (Para. 9) |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
The Impossibility of Movement (Para. 10) |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
The Theory of the Sauryodayika-Darstantikas (vijnapti-as-wind): |
|
|
48 | (2) |
|
|
|
48 | (1) |
|
Refutation (Para. 12--13) |
|
|
49 | (1) |
| B. THE AVIJNAPTI (Para. 14) |
|
50 | (67) |
| Second Part: THE MECHANISM OF THE RETRIBUTION OF ACTION |
|
|
The Theory of the Sarvastivadin-Vaibhasikas: the Existence of Past Action (Para. 15--17) |
|
|
52 | (3) |
|
The Theory of the Early Sammitiyas: Avipranasa; |
|
|
55 | (1) |
|
|
|
55 | (1) |
|
|
|
55 | (1) |
|
The Theory of the Sautrantikas; Samtanaparinama |
|
|
56 | (2) |
|
|
|
56 | (1) |
|
Answer to the Objections (Para. 21) |
|
|
56 | (2) |
| Third Part: THE ``SERIES'' OR THE RIPENING ACTION |
|
|
Preliminary Question: Nirodhasamapatti |
|
|
58 | (8) |
|
The Opinion of the Sarvastivadin-Vaibhasikas (Para. 22) |
|
|
58 | (1) |
|
Root-opinion of the Darstantikas (Para. 23) |
|
|
58 | (1) |
|
Branch-opinion of Vasumitra, of the Sautrantikas, etc. (Para. 24--25) |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
Variant Branch-opinion of the Sautrantikas: |
|
|
60 | (4) |
|
|
|
60 | (1) |
|
Refutation (Para. 27--29) |
|
|
61 | (3) |
|
Theory of the Sutrapramanikas and of Vasubandhu (Para. 30--32) |
|
|
64 | (2) |
|
|
|
66 | (6) |
|
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
Alambana and Akara (Para. 36) |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
Answer to Objections (Para. 37--39) |
|
|
67 | (2) |
|
Alayavijnana and Atman (Para. 40) |
|
|
69 | (3) |
| Fourth Part: THE SAUTRANTIKA THEORY ON THE NATURE OF ACTION |
|
|
The Three Actions in the Sutra (Para. 41--42) |
|
|
72 | (1) |
|
Kaya and Karman (Para. 43) |
|
|
72 | (1) |
|
The Meaning of the Word Kaya (Para. 44) |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
The Meaning of the Word Karman (Para. 45) |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
The Meaning of the Word Kayakarman: |
|
|
73 | (2) |
|
Literal Meaning (Para. 46) |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
Figurative Meaning (Para. 47) |
|
|
74 | (1) |
|
The Meaning of the Expression Vakkarman (Para. 48) |
|
|
75 | (1) |
|
The Meaning of the Expression Manahkarman (Para. 49) |
|
|
75 | (1) |
|
The Principle of the Classification of Actions (Para. 49) |
|
|
76 | (2) |
| MADHYAMAKAVRTTI: CHAPTER XVII |
|
|
The Theory of the Early Buddhists |
|
|
78 | (5) |
|
The reality of transmigration |
|
|
78 | (1) |
|
Mind-action, the cause of Dharma |
|
|
78 | (2) |
|
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
The Three Types of Action |
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
The Seven Types of Action |
|
|
81 | (2) |
|
The Theory of the Sautrantikas |
|
|
83 | (3) |
|
Refutation of the Vibhajyavadin theory |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
The theory of seed-action |
|
|
83 | (2) |
|
The ten pathways of action |
|
|
85 | (1) |
|
The Theory of the Sammitiyas |
|
|
86 | (5) |
|
Refutation of the Sautrantika thesis |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
|
|
87 | (4) |
|
Definition and division of avipanasa |
|
|
87 | (1) |
|
Cutting off of the avipranasa |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
The arising of avipranasa |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
Destruction of avipranasa |
|
|
90 | (1) |
|
Justification of avipranasa |
|
|
90 | (1) |
|
The Theory of the Madhyamikas |
|
|
91 | (26) |
|
The non-existence of action |
|
|
91 | (2) |
|
The non-existence of defilement |
|
|
93 | (1) |
|
The non-existence of the body |
|
|
94 | (1) |
|
The non-existence of the enjoyer |
|
|
94 | (1) |
|
Efficacy of a non-substantial action |
|
|
95 | (22) |
| A Brief Biography of Etienne Lamotte |
|
117 | (9) |
| Index |
|
126 | |
