| Preface |
|
xiii | |
| PART I POLICIES |
|
1 | (88) |
|
|
|
3 | (8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 | (2) |
|
|
|
5 | (6) |
|
Integrating expert and common knowledge for sustainable housing management |
|
|
11 | (18) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 | (1) |
|
|
|
12 | (2) |
|
Reframing housing problems |
|
|
14 | (2) |
|
|
|
16 | (2) |
|
|
|
18 | (6) |
|
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
|
|
25 | (4) |
|
Sustainable building policies: exploring the implementation gap |
|
|
29 | (14) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 | (1) |
|
The contested nature of sustainable building |
|
|
30 | (2) |
|
Decision-making in a complex multi-actor setting |
|
|
32 | (2) |
|
Barriers to the implementation of sustainable building measures |
|
|
34 | (2) |
|
How can we make good decisions? |
|
|
36 | (3) |
|
|
|
39 | (4) |
|
Eco-labelling for buildings |
|
|
43 | (16) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 | (4) |
|
|
|
47 | (2) |
|
Attitudes and expectations of interest groups in the building sector |
|
|
49 | (6) |
|
|
|
55 | (4) |
|
Bio-climatic technologies in Mediterranean Countries |
|
|
59 | (18) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How climate affects traditional architecture. A comparison between different countries of the Mediterranean Region |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
The sector of construction and the economic situation |
|
|
60 | (5) |
|
The energy regulation in the building sector |
|
|
65 | (1) |
|
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
The region of Puglia: results of the research |
|
|
67 | (6) |
|
Conclusions: a brief look at Mediterranean Architecture |
|
|
73 | (4) |
|
Actions towards professionals and the general public to overcome the barriers to the development of bioclimatic technologies |
|
|
77 | (12) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77 | (1) |
|
Study of the barriers to the development of bioclimatics |
|
|
77 | (1) |
|
|
|
78 | (3) |
|
|
|
81 | (2) |
|
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
|
|
83 | (2) |
|
|
|
85 | (1) |
|
|
|
86 | (3) |
| PART II TOOLS |
|
89 | (112) |
|
Environmental impact assessment methods in the Netherlands |
|
|
91 | (18) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91 | (1) |
|
|
|
92 | (3) |
|
Buildings and constructions |
|
|
95 | (1) |
|
|
|
96 | (2) |
|
Developing an environmental impact assessment method for spatial plans |
|
|
98 | (3) |
|
|
|
101 | (8) |
|
Environmental impact of Dutch of dwellings: Priorities for reduction and benefits of sustainable construction |
|
|
109 | (26) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109 | (2) |
|
Sustainable construction and renovation in ``The Ecological City'' |
|
|
111 | (1) |
|
Environmental assessment method |
|
|
112 | (4) |
|
Environmental analysis of Dutch traditional housing |
|
|
116 | (7) |
|
Environmental benefits of Dutch sustainable housing |
|
|
123 | (8) |
|
|
|
131 | (4) |
|
Modelling environmental complexity for sustainable design practice |
|
|
135 | (26) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135 | (1) |
|
The qualitative physical modelling approach |
|
|
136 | (2) |
|
Complexity of natural ventilation problems in design |
|
|
138 | (6) |
|
Modelling physical behaviour using Bayesian networks |
|
|
144 | (6) |
|
Causal model of natural ventilation |
|
|
150 | (5) |
|
Merging networks to deal with model interaction |
|
|
155 | (2) |
|
|
|
157 | (4) |
|
EPIQR-TOBUS: a new generation of refurbishment decision aid methods |
|
|
161 | (10) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161 | (1) |
|
|
|
162 | (1) |
|
Building deterioration state |
|
|
162 | (1) |
|
|
|
163 | (2) |
|
Heating/cooling energy demand and energy saving potential |
|
|
165 | (2) |
|
Occupants and indoor environment quality |
|
|
167 | (1) |
|
Building a refurbishment scenario |
|
|
167 | (1) |
|
|
|
167 | (1) |
|
|
|
168 | (3) |
|
Support measures for sustainable building |
|
|
171 | (30) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171 | (1) |
|
Qualitative tools for designers |
|
|
172 | (1) |
|
|
|
173 | (2) |
|
|
|
175 | (1) |
|
|
|
176 | (2) |
|
|
|
178 | (2) |
|
Performance assessment tools |
|
|
180 | (3) |
|
|
|
183 | (4) |
|
|
|
187 | (2) |
|
|
|
189 | (2) |
|
The challenge of sharing knowledge |
|
|
191 | (7) |
|
|
|
198 | (3) |
| PART III CHALLENGES |
|
201 | (48) |
|
Research in construction engineering and technology: the international context |
|
|
203 | (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
203 | (1) |
|
|
|
204 | (1) |
|
Improvement of life quality, safety and value of the built-up environment |
|
|
204 | (1) |
|
Re-engineering the construction process |
|
|
205 | (1) |
|
|
|
206 | (1) |
|
The life cycle of building |
|
|
207 | (20) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
207 | (1) |
|
|
|
208 | (2) |
|
|
|
210 | (2) |
|
|
|
212 | (3) |
|
|
|
215 | (2) |
|
|
|
217 | (2) |
|
|
|
219 | (4) |
|
|
|
223 | (4) |
|
Sustainable construction: some economic challenges |
|
|
227 | (14) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
227 | (1) |
|
Systainable development and construction |
|
|
227 | (1) |
|
Review of recent literature on sustainable construction |
|
|
228 | (2) |
|
Some economic challenges facing sustainable construction |
|
|
230 | (3) |
|
|
|
233 | (8) |
|
On the way towards sustainable building |
|
|
241 | (8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
241 | (1) |
|
|
|
242 | (2) |
|
|
|
244 | (4) |
|
Sustainable building indicators |
|
|
248 | (1) |
|
|
|
249 | |
