The Nature of Scientific Thinking On Interpretation, Explanation and Understanding

For a long time philosophers and scientists have wrestled with explanatory and representational questions such as what can be considered the right form of explanation, what makes something explanatory, and how does a representation by which one explains connect to the world. Therefore explanation and representation are some of the most debated concepts that characterize scientific thinking; yet, there is little consensus among specialists on how explanation and representation in a scientific context should be described. The author argues that issues of explanations and representations must be approached according to their pragmatic roles in a scientific practice of providing understanding. He sees understanding as different from knowledge as an organization of beliefs, a capacity that human beings partly have inherited through biological evolution, partly learned through reflective thinking. However, assumptions expressing these beliefs are claimed to be explanatory not because they are true, but because they fit a rhetorical scheme of communication. Thus, the book becomes a study in naturalism and scientific pluralism.

Jan Faye is a philosopher of science at the University of Copenhagen, Denmark. He has written and edited a number of books in English as well as in Danish. Recently, he published After Postmodernism (2012), a book about the philosophy of the humanities, in which he argues that a pragmatic-naturalist understanding of humanistic research overcomes the traditional split in our views of the natural sciences and the humanities.

Introduction to the Reader and Acknowledgements
1. Forms of Understanding
2. Understanding As Organized Beliefs
3. On Interpretation
4. Representations
5. Scientific Explanation
6. Causal Explanations
7. Other Tpes of Explanations
8. The Pragmatics of Explanation
9. Not Just Why-questions
10. A Rhetorical Approach to Explanation
11. Pluralism and The Unity of Science
Literature
Notes