Why Iowa?

If Barack Obama had not won in Iowa, most commentators believe that he would not have been able to go on to capture the Democratic nomination for president.Why Iowa?offers the definitive account of those early weeks of the campaign season: from how the Iowa caucuses work and what motivates the candidates' campaigns, to participation and turnout, as well as the lingering effects that the campaigning had on Iowa voters. Demonstrating how "what happens in Iowa" truly reverberates throughout the country, five-time Iowa precinct caucus chair David P. Redlawsk and his coauthors take us on an inside tour of one of the most media-saturated and speculated-about campaign events in American politics. Considering whether a sequential primary system, in which early, smaller states such as Iowa and New Hampshire have such a tremendous impact is fair or beneficial to the country as a whole, the authors here demonstrate that not only is the impact warranted, but it also reveals a great deal about informational elements of the campaigns. Contrary to conventional wisdom, this sequential system does confer huge benefits on the nominating process while Iowa's particularly well-designed caucus systemextensively explored here for the first timebrings candidates' arguments, strengths, and weaknesses into the open and under the media's lens.

David P. Redlawsk is professor of political science and director of the Eagleton Center for Public Interest Polling at Rutgers University, New Brunswick. Caroline J. Tolbert is professor of political science at the University of Iowa, Iowa City. Todd Donovan is professor of political science at Western Washington University. They are all the authors, editors, or coauthors of numerous previous books.