Authoritarian Party Structures and Democratic Political Setting in Turkey

Political culture and institutions may cause the development of authoritarian party organizations. Yet, what constitutes their structure and what explains their changing patterns across time and space? Conducting a comparative case study among four parties in the Turkish political system and utilizing the principal-agent approach to party governance, this study shows how the variance in interest configurations and the power resources of local party activists constitute these changing patterns. Musil argues that exit from intra-party authoritarianism is always a possibility not only because the party leaders choose to do so, but because the local party activists can challenge the existing structures by cultivating their own power resources.

Pelin Ayan Musil is currently a faculty member at the School of International Relations and Diplomacy at Anglo-American University in Prague, Czech Republic. She holds an MA from Central European University and a PhD from Bilkent University. She has also been a Fulbright Visiting Researcher at Georgetown University, and her articles have appeared in such journals as Turkish Studies and Teaching in Higher Education.

Existing Explanations on Intra-Party Authoritarianism * Intra-Party Authoritarianism in Turkey * A Principal-Agent Approach to Intra-Party Authoritarianism * Understanding the Variance in Intra-Party Authoritarianism * Intra-Party Authoritarianism in Turkey: Empirical Findings * Explaining the Variance in Intra-Party Authoritarianism in Turkey * Conclusions, Implications, Future Studies * Appendix A: List of Open-ended Interview Questions * Appendix B: Outline of the Interviews