The Clean Water Act and the Constitution
, by Craig, Robin KundisNote: Supplemental materials are not guaranteed with Rental or Used book purchases.
- ISBN: 9781585761388 | 1585761389
- Cover: Paperback
- Copyright: 5/1/2009
"One of the most revolutionary statutes ever enacted by Congress, the Clean Water Act (CWA) has produced remarkable progress over the past 25 years. Much of that progress, however, is threatened today-and some of those threats come from a number of recent Supreme Court decisions. Professor Craig's book presents a thorough, straightforward examination of the CWA's approach to delegated federalism and the constitutional provisions that have both empowered and bedeviled the statute. Her book deserves a place on the bookshelves of all those who are seasoned CWA lawyers as well as those who are learning to navigate one of the most complex statutes ever written." Book jacket.
Robin K. Craig is Attorneys’ Title Insurance Fund Professor of Law at Florida State University College of Law and codirector of the Program in Environmental and Land Use Law. She is the author of Environmental Law in Context: Cases and Materials.
Acknowledgments | p. xiii |
Introduction: Environmental Regulation and the Constitution | p. 1 |
Imposing Federal Regulation and Enforcement | p. 7 |
The Clean Water Act's "Cooperative Federalism" and the Federal/State Regulatory Balance | p. 9 |
A Short History of Pre-1972 Federal Water Quality Regulation in the United States | p. 10 |
The RHA (Refuse Act) | p. 10 |
The FWPCA of 1948 | p. 12 |
The Water Pollution Control Act Extension of 1952 | p. 13 |
Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1956 | p. 13 |
The FWPCA Amendments of 1961 | p. 15 |
Water Quality Act of 1965 | p. 17 |
Clean Water Restoration Act of 1966 | p. 19 |
Water and Environmental Quality Improvement Act of 1970 | p. 20 |
The 1970 Changes to the RHA: A Federal Permit Program for Water Pollution | p. 21 |
The 1972 Amendments and the Creation of the Contemporary CWA | p. 22 |
Cooperative Federalism in the Current CWA | p. 27 |
Subchapter I: Research and Related Programs | p. 27 |
Subchapter II: Grants for Construction of Treatment Works | p. 28 |
Subchapter III: Standards and Enforcement | p. 29 |
The Elements of Federal Jurisdiction Under the Contemporary CWA | p. 29 |
Federal Standard Setting | p. 31 |
Retained State Authority Over Water Quality | p. 32 |
Subchapter IV: Permits and Licenses | p. 34 |
State Primacy Over Water Quality, Continued: Water Quality Certifications | p. 34 |
The CWA's Two Permit Programs | p. 34 |
Enforcement Under the CWA | p. 35 |
The Supremacy Clause and Federal Preemption of State Water Quality Law | p. 39 |
The Supremacy Clause and Federal Preemption of State Law | p. 40 |
The CWA and Preemption of State Law | p. 43 |
The CWA's "Saving" Clauses | p. 43 |
Express Preemption in the CWA: Marine Sanitation Devices and Traditional Federal Authority Over Navigation and Vessel Requirements | p. 46 |
Section 312's Express Preemption Provisions | p. 46 |
Federal Preemption of Vessel Design in General | p. 46 |
The Scope of §312's Preemption | p. 48 |
The CWA and the PWSA: An Uneasy Tension Between Vessel Design and Pollution Control | p. 49 |
Supremacy Clause Ambiguity: Preemption of State and Private Remedies for Oil Spills | p. 51 |
Implicit and Conflict Preemption in the CWA: Federal Preemption of Less Stringent State Regulation | p. 53 |
Conflict Preemption, Federalism, and the Ambiguous Status of State Water Quality Standards in Interstate River Systems | p. 55 |
The Overall Effect of the Supremacy Clause on the CWA | p. 57 |
Interstate Water Pollution, Federal Common Law, and the Clean Water Act | p. 59 |
Interstate Water Pollution in the Court Before 1972 | p. 60 |
Missouri v. Illinois | p. 60 |
Interstate Pollution Disputes, 1906-1972 | p. 63 |
The CWA's Interstate Water Pollution Provisions | p. 67 |
Section 401 | p. 67 |
State-Issued CWA Permits and Interstate Water Quality | p. 69 |
Interstate Citizen Suits | p. 70 |
The CWA and the Federal Common Law of Nuisance | p. 70 |
Interstate Water Pollution, the CWA, and State Common-Law Nuisance: International Paper Co. v. Ouellette | p. 74 |
Complex Rivers: A Resurgence of Federal Authority? | p. 74 |
Sovereign Immunity and State Regulation of Federal Facilities and Tribes | p. 77 |
The CWA, Federal Facilities, and Federal Sovereign Immunity | p. 77 |
Introduction | p. 77 |
Federal Sovereign Immunity and State NPDES Permitting | p. 81 |
The Scope of the Waiver of Sovereign Immunity From State Permitting Requirements | p. 84 |
Federal Facility Liability for Civil Penalties Under State Programs | p. 85 |
Civil Penalties, Government Enforcement, and Federal Facility Compliance With the CWA | p. 89 |
Federal Facilities and State Water Quality Standards Outside the Point Source and Permitting Contexts | p. 92 |
Tribal Sovereign Immunity and State Regulation of Tribes | p. 100 |
Tribal Sovereign Immunity, Congress, and the CWA | p. 100 |
Tribal Sovereign Immunity, the States, and the CWA | p. 100 |
Congress' Emphasis on Tribal Sovereign Immunity: Treatment-as-a-State (TAS) Status | p. 105 |
Limits on Federal Water Quality Regulation: The Tenth Amendment, the Commerce Clause, and Clean Water Act "Navigable Waters" | p. 109 |
The Commerce Clause and the Tenth Amendment | p. 110 |
The CWA's "Navigable Waters" | p. 116 |
CWA "Navigable Waters" and the Commerce Clause | p. 119 |
Early Commerce Clause Evaluations of the CWA | p. 119 |
United States v. Riverside Bayview Homes, Inc. and Adjacent Wetlands | p. 121 |
Isolated Waters and the Commerce Clause Debate | p. 122 |
The Court's Statutory Interpretation, Part II | p. 125 |
Federalism as a Mode of CWA Interpretation, 2001-2006 | p. 128 |
Rapanos v. United States: Federalism, Wetlands, and Congress' Water Quality Goals | p. 131 |
CWA Jurisdiction in the Lower Courts After Rapanos: Deciding Among the Justices | p. 138 |
"Navigable Waters" and the Commerce Clause: What Is the Constitutional Limit of Congress' Authority to Regulate Water Quality? | p. 141 |
The Channels of Interstate Commerce: The Oceans, Contiguous Zones, Territorial Seas, and Traditionally Navigable Waters | p. 141 |
Non-Navigable Interstate Waters | p. 144 |
Non-Navigable Interstate Waters and the Substantial Relationship to Interstate Commerce | p. 144 |
Limiting Federal and State Enforcement of the Clean Water Act: Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment "Takings" of Private Property | p. 149 |
The History of the Regulatory Takings Doctrine | p. 149 |
Distinguishing Physical and Regulatory Takings | p. 157 |
Regulatory "Takings" and the CWA | p. 159 |
Is the "Taking" Claim Ripe? | p. 160 |
Is There a Lucas-Type Categorical "Taking"? | p. 161 |
Is There a "Taking" Under the Penn Central Balancing Test? | p. 162 |
The Character of the Government Action | p. 163 |
Interference With the Claimant's Reasonable, Investment-Backed Expectations for the Property | p. 163 |
Economic Impact of the Permit Denial | p. 164 |
Can There Be a Temporary "Taking"? | p. 165 |
The Overall Effect of Fifth Amendment "Takings" on the CWA's Regulatory Regime | p. 166 |
Imposition of Citizen Participation and Enforcements | p. 169 |
The Second Theme in Congress' Restructuring of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act: The Addition of Citizen Participation and Citizen Suits | p. 171 |
Citizen Participation in the Clean Water Act (CWA) and the Creation of the CWA's Citizen Suit Provision | p. 171 |
Later Amendments to the CWA's Citizen Suit Provision | p. 176 |
Bringing a CWA Citizen Suit: The Statutory Requirements | p. 177 |
Causes of Action | p. 177 |
Jurisdiction and Venue | p. 181 |
The Notice Requirement | p. 181 |
The Gwaltney Requirement | p. 184 |
Preclusion by State and Federal Enforcement | p. 186 |
Citizen Suit Enforcement and the CWA | p. 190 |
Article III Separation of Powers, Standing, and the Rejection of a "Public Rights" Model of Environmental Citizen Suits | p. 193 |
Article III and Federal Courts' "Case or Controversy" Requirement | p. 193 |
Environmental Standing and Citizen Suits | p. 199 |
Early Environmental Standing Cases | p. 199 |
Sierra Club v. Morton and the Elimination of Privately Enforceable Public Environmental Rights | p. 199 |
Further Refinement of Environmental Standing Requirement in the 1990s | p. 204 |
Relaxing Injury-in-Fact Since 2000? Resonable Fears, Climate Change, and Increased Risk in the Standing Analysis | p. 208 |
The 2000 Decision in Laidlaw | p. 208 |
The Court's 2007 Standing Analysis in Massachusetts v. EPA: Liberalization of Defenders of Wildlife or Special Standing for States? | p. 209 |
The Increased Risk Standing Trend | p. 213 |
Standing and CWA Litigation | p. 214 |
Citizen Suits Against the Federal Government and Tribes | p. 219 |
The CWA's Waiver of Sovereign Immunity for Subsection (a)(1) Citizen Suits Against Federal Facilities That Are Violating the Act | p. 219 |
Section 505's Procedurally Limited Waiver of Sovereign Immunity | p. 219 |
Attempts to Evade §505's Limitations | p. 221 |
Civil Penalties in Citizen Suits Against the Federal Government | p. 222 |
Section 505's Waiver of Sovereign Immunity for Subsection (a)(1) Citizen Suits Against Tribes That Are Violating the CWA | p. 226 |
The CWA's Waiver of Sovereign Immunity for Subsection (a)(2) Citizen Suits Against the EPA Administrator for Failure to Perform Nondiscretionary Duties | p. 228 |
Suits Against the Administrator of EPA | p. 228 |
Suits Against the Corps | p. 229 |
Citizen Suits Against States and Territories and the Eleventh Amendment | p. 233 |
Congress' Attempt to Abrogate State Sovereign Immunity in the CWA and the U.S. Supreme Court's Eleventh Amendment Jurisprudence | p. 233 |
CWA Citizen Suits Against States After Seminole Tribe | p. 239 |
Citizen Suits Against States and State Agencies | p. 239 |
CWA Citizen Suits Against State Officials: The Ex Parte Young Doctrine | p. 241 |
Cooperative Federalism as a Waiver of Eleventh Amendment Sovereign Immunity? | p. 245 |
CWA Citizen Suits Against Territories and the District of Columbia After Seminole Tribe | p. 247 |
Citizen Suits Against Territories | p. 247 |
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico | p. 248 |
Virgin Islands | p. 249 |
Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands | p. 250 |
The CNMI | p. 251 |
Guam | p. 252 |
American Samoa | p. 254 |
CWA Citizen Suits Against the District of Columbia | p. 254 |
The Effects of Seminole Tribe on Citizen Suits Against States | p. 255 |
Article II Separation of Powers and the President's Enforcement Right | p. 257 |
Article II Separation-of-Powers Principles | p. 257 |
Article II Separation of Powers and the "Take Care" Clause | p. 258 |
Separation of Powers and the Appointments Clause | p. 261 |
Article II Separation-of-Powers Issues and Environmental Citizen Suits: Decisions to Date | p. 264 |
The "Take Care" Clause and Environmental Citizen Suits | p. 266 |
The Appointments Clause and Environmental Citizen Suits | p. 269 |
Do Citizen Suits Allow the Federal Courts and Congress to Usurp the Executive? | p. 270 |
Resolving Article II Separation-of-Powers Challenges to Environmental Citizen Suit Provisions | p. 271 |
The Qui Tam Comparison | p. 272 |
Environmental Citizen Suits and Standing | p. 276 |
Would Public Interest Citizen Suits Violate Article II Separation of Powers? | p. 277 |
Conclusion: Should There Be a Constitutional Right to a Clean/Healthy Environment? | p. 281 |
The Importance of Citizen Suits to Environmental Enforcement | p. 284 |
Constitutional Jurisprudence and Environmental Citizen Suit Litigation | p. 291 |
Restoring Citizen Enforcement of Federal Environmental Law: Two Possible Solutions | p. 292 |
Adopt a Public Rights/Public Interest Approach to Citizen Litigation | p. 292 |
Amend the Constitution | p. 293 |
The Purely Structural Amendment | p. 293 |
Standing | p. 295 |
Eleventh Amendment | p. 295 |
Federal Sovereign Immunity | p. 296 |
Article II Separation-of-Powers Concerns | p. 297 |
Elimination of Commerce Clause Concerns | p. 297 |
Balancing of Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment "Takings" | p. 297 |
A Proposed Structural Amendment to the Constitution | p. 297 |
The Amendment Adding a Substantive Constitutional Right to a Clean and Healthy Environment | p. 298 |
Prior Litigation Indicates That Spontaneous Recognition of Environmental Rights in the Constitution Are Unlikely | p. 299 |
Normative Arguments Favor a Constitutional Amendment Guaranteeing a Right to Sue, But Not Necessarily a Substantive Environmental Right | p. 300 |
The Law Generally Recognizes That Beneficiaries Should Have the Right to Sue | p. 300 |
Constitutional Environmental Protections Are Becoming More Prevalent Among the Nations of the World, Indicating That the Environment Is Worthy of Constitution-Level Concern | p. 302 |
Individual States Within the United States-the Vanguard of American Law-Are Also Increasingly Recognizing That the Environment Should Be a Constitutional Concern | p. 304 |
Conclusion | p. 306 |
Table of Contents provided by Ingram. All Rights Reserved. |
What is included with this book?
The New copy of this book will include any supplemental materials advertised. Please check the title of the book to determine if it should include any access cards, study guides, lab manuals, CDs, etc.
The Used, Rental and eBook copies of this book are not guaranteed to include any supplemental materials. Typically, only the book itself is included. This is true even if the title states it includes any access cards, study guides, lab manuals, CDs, etc.