How to Stay Smart in a Smart World Why Human Intelligence Still Beats Algorithms

, by
How to Stay Smart in a Smart World Why Human Intelligence Still Beats Algorithms by Gigerenzer, Gerd, 9780262548441
Note: Supplemental materials are not guaranteed with Rental or Used book purchases.
  • ISBN: 9780262548441 | 0262548445
  • Cover: Paperback
  • Copyright: 2/4/2025

Purchase Options
  • Rent

    (Recommended)

    $22.21
    Term
    Due
    Price
    *This item is part of an exclusive publisher rental program and requires an additional convenience fee. This fee will be reflected in the shopping bag.
  • Buy New

    In Stock Usually Ships in 24-48 Hours

    $26.65
  • eBook

    eTextBook from VitalSource Icon

    Available Instantly

    Online: 1825 Days

    Downloadable: Lifetime Access

    *To support the delivery of the digital material to you, a digital delivery fee of $3.99 will be charged on each digital item.
    $17.99*
How to stay in charge in a world populated by algorithms that beat us in chess, find us romantic partners, and tell us to “turn right in 500 yards.”

Doomsday prophets of technology predict that robots will take over the world, leaving humans behind in the dust. Tech industry boosters think replacing people with software might make the world a better place—while tech industry critics warn darkly about surveillance capitalism. Despite their differing views of the future, they all seem to agree: machines will soon do everything better than humans. In How to Stay Smart in a Smart World, Gerd Gigerenzer shows why that’s not true, and tells us how we can stay in charge in a world populated by algorithms.

Machines powered by artificial intelligence are good at some things (playing chess), but not others (life-and-death decisions, or anything involving uncertainty). Gigerenzer explains why algorithms often fail at finding us romantic partners (love is not chess), why self-driving cars fall prey to the Russian Tank Fallacy, and how judges and police rely increasingly on nontransparent “black box” algorithms to predict whether a criminal defendant will reoffend or show up in court. He invokes Black Mirror, considers the privacy paradox (people want privacy but give their data away), and explains that social media get us hooked by programming intermittent reinforcement in the form of the “like” button. We shouldn’t trust smart technology unconditionally, Gigerenzer tells us, but we shouldn’t fear it unthinkingly, either.