Law and Neuroscience Current Legal Issues Volume 13

Current Legal Issues, like its sister volume Current Legal Problems, is based upon an annual colloquium held at University College London. Each year leading scholars from around the world gather to discuss the relationship between law and another discipline of thought. Each colloquium examines how the external discipline is conceived in legal thought and argument, how the law is pictured in that discipline, and analyses points of controversy in the use, and abuse, of extra-legal arguments within legal theory and practice. Law and Neuroscience, the latest volume in the Current Legal Issues series, offers an insight into the state of law and neuroscience scholarship today. Focusing on the inter-connections between the two disciplines, it addresses the key issues informing current debates.

Michael Freeman is Professor of English Law at University College London and is the series editor for Current Legal Issues.

1. Introduction, M. Freeman
2. What Neuroscience can (and cannot) tell us about criminal responsibility, W. Glannon
3. Mens Rea, Logic and The Brain, G-J Lokhorst
4. Indeterminism and Control: An approach to the problem of luck, J. Fischer
5. Neuroscience and Criminal Responsibility: Proving "Can't Help Himself" as a narrow bar to criminal liability, H. T. Greely
6. Madness, Badness and Neuro-imagining-based responsibility assessments, N. Vincent
7. Brain Images as Evidence in the Criminal Law, A. L. Roskies and W. Sinnott-Armstrong
8. The Neural Correlates of Third-Party Punishment, J. Buckholtz et al
9. Law, Neuroscience and Criminal Culpability, L. Claydon
10. How (some) Criminals are Made, T. Y. Blumoff
11. Neuroscience and Penal Law: Ineffectiveness of the penal systems and flawed perception of the underevaluation of behaviour constituting crime, D. Terracina
12. Neuroscience and Emotional Harm in Tort Law: Rethinking the American approach to freestanding emotional distress claims, B. J. Grey
13. Neuroscience and Ideology: Why science can never supply a complete answer for adolescent immaturity, J. Carbone
14. Adolescent Brain Science and Juvenile Justice, T. Maroney
15. The Neuroscience of Cruelty as Brain Damage: Legal framings of capacity and ethical issues in the neurorehabilitation of Motor Neurone Disease, R. MacKenzie and M. Sakel
16. The Carmentis Machine: Legal and ethical issues in the use of neuroimaging to guide treatment withdrawal in newborn infants, D. Wilkinson and C . Foster
17. The Right to Silence as Protecting Mental Control, D. Fox
18. Minds Apart: Severe brain injury, citizenship and civil rights, J. J. Fins
19. Reciprocity and Neuroscience in Public Health Law, A. M. Viens
20. Pathways to Persuasion: How neuroscience can inform the study and practice of law, C. Boudreau, S Coulson and M. D. McCubbins
21. The Juridical Rise of Emotions in the Decisional Process of Popular Juries, L. Capraro
22. Possible Neural Mechanisms Underlying Ethical Behaviour, D. W. Pfaff
23. What Hobbes Left Out: The neuroscience of comparison and its implications for a new Commonwealth, J. D. Duffy
24. Neuroscience and the Free Exercise of Religion, S. Goldberg
25. Steps toward a Constructivist and Coherentist Theory of Judicial Reasoning in Civil Law Tradition, E. Carceres
26. Evolutionary Jurisprudence: The end of the naturalistic fallacy and the beginning of natural reform?, M. B. Hoffman
27. The History of Scientific and Clinical Images in Mid-to-Late 19th Century American Legal Culture: Implications for contemporary law and neuroscience, D. S. Goldberg
28. Lost in Translation? An essay on law and neuroscience, S. J. Morse