Mastery, Dependence, and the Ethics of Authority

Over the last few decades, skepticism about political and moral experts has grown into a serious social problem, undermining the functioning of liberal democratic regimes. Indeed, meritocracy-that is, government by hard working, public-spirited people with high levels of relevant expertise-has never looked so promising as an alternative to the dangers of know-nothing populism. One cultural tradition has devoted sustained attention to the idea of meritocracy, as well as to the cultivation of true expertise or mastery: Confucianism.

Mastery, Dependence, and the Ethics of Authority presents a compelling analysis of expertise and authority, and examines classical Confucian conceptions of mastery, dependence, and human relationships in order to suggest new approaches to these issues in ethics and political theory. Contemporary Westerners are heirs to multiple traditions that are suspicious of authority, especially coercive political authority. We are also increasingly wary of dependence, which now often seems to signify weakness, neediness, and pathology. Analysts commonly presume that both authority and dependence threaten human autonomy, and are thus intrinsically problematic. But these judgments are mistaken. Our capacity for autonomy needs to be cultivated over time through deliberate practices of training, in which we depend on the guidance of virtuous and skilled teachers. Confucian thought provides a subtle and powerful analysis of one version of this training process, and of the social supports such an education in autonomy requires-as well as the social value of having virtuous and skilled leaders. Early Confucians also argue that human life is marked by numerous interacting forms of dependence, which are not only ineradicable, but in many ways good. On a Confucian view, it is natural, healthy, and good for people to be deeply dependent on others in a variety of ways across the full human lifespan. They teach us that individual autonomy only develops within a social matrix, structured by relationships of mutual dependence that can either help or hinder it, including a variety of authority relations.

Aaron Stalnaker is Associate Professor of Religious Studies at Indiana University. He is the author of Overcoming Our Evil: Human Nature and Spiritual Exercises in Xunzi and Augustine (Georgetown University Press, 2006), and has published articles in the Journal of Religious Ethics, Soundings, Philosophy East and West, Dao, and International Philosophical Quarterly, among other venues. He founded the Comparative Religious Ethics group within the American Academy of Religion, and is currently Associate Editor of the Journal of Religious Ethics.

Acknowledgments
Conventions

Chapter One: Paradoxes of Freedom: Modern Western Difficulties with Authority and Dependence
Chapter Two: Early China and the Quest for Mastery
Chapter Three: Virtue, Skill, and Mastery
Chapter Four: The Confucian Dào: Mastery as the Fruit of Shared Practices
Chapter Five: Dependence, Autonomy, and the Varieties of Relationship
Chapter Six: Dreaming of a Meritocracy, Grappling with Reality
Chapter Seven: Learning from the Early Confucians

Bibliography
Index